Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for Map argument #69

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add support for Map argument #69

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

gkorland
Copy link
Contributor

@gkorland gkorland commented Sep 16, 2024

fix #68

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the string conversion functionality to support Map objects, allowing for improved representation of complex data structures.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test for verifying the creation of graph nodes using map structures, enhancing test coverage for node creation operations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made in this pull request enhance the valueToString method in the Utils class to support the conversion of Map objects to string representations. The method now checks for Map instances, iterates over their entries, and constructs a string in the format key:value, removing any trailing commas. Additionally, a new test method testMapSupport has been added to the GraphAPITest class to validate this functionality by creating a node with map properties.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java Enhanced valueToString method to include support for converting Map objects to string format.
src/test/java/com/falkordb/GraphAPITest.java Added testMapSupport method to validate map handling in node creation tests.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add support for Map in prepareQuery (#68)

🐰 In the land of code where rabbits play,
A map now sings in a string ballet.
With keys and values dancing in line,
Our valueToString shines, oh so fine!
Hops of joy for each data type,
In curly braces, they now delight! 🐇✨

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (9f2436e) to head (5960486).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #69   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files          25      25           
  Lines         712     722   +10     
  Branches       64      67    +3     
======================================
- Misses        712     722   +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java (1)

88-101: Add tests to improve code coverage.

The static analysis tool has flagged that the added lines are not covered by tests. To ensure the reliability and maintainability of the code, it's important to have adequate test coverage.

Do you want me to generate test cases for the added functionality or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 90-91: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L90-L91
Added lines #L90 - L91 were not covered by tests


[warning] 93-94: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L93-L94
Added lines #L93 - L94 were not covered by tests


[warning] 97-97: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L97
Added line #L97 was not covered by tests


[warning] 99-100: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L99-L100
Added lines #L99 - L100 were not covered by tests

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b3efd1d and 78922bc.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java

[warning] 90-91: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L90-L91
Added lines #L90 - L91 were not covered by tests


[warning] 93-94: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L93-L94
Added lines #L93 - L94 were not covered by tests


[warning] 97-97: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L97
Added line #L97 was not covered by tests


[warning] 99-100: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L99-L100
Added lines #L99 - L100 were not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (1)
src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java (1)

88-101: LGTM! The code changes align with the PR objectives.

The added support for converting Map objects to string representations in the valueToString method addresses the limitation mentioned in the linked issue #68. The implementation correctly handles the recursive conversion of map entries and formats the resulting string appropriately.

Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 90-91: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L90-L91
Added lines #L90 - L91 were not covered by tests


[warning] 93-94: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L93-L94
Added lines #L93 - L94 were not covered by tests


[warning] 97-97: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L97
Added line #L97 was not covered by tests


[warning] 99-100: src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java#L99-L100
Added lines #L99 - L100 were not covered by tests

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java (1)

87-101: Consider quoting map keys for better consistency and safer Cypher queries.
Currently, map keys are converted to strings without quoting, which may lead to parsing issues if a JSON-like value contains spaces or punctuation. Also, if the key is of a different type, calling toString() might produce unexpected or ambiguous results. To improve safety and consistency (mirroring how string values are quoted), consider wrapping keys with quotes as well.

For example:

 for (Map.Entry<Object, Object> entry : map.entrySet()) {
-    sb.append(entry.getKey()).append(':').append(valueToString(entry.getValue())).append(",");
+    String keyStr = (entry.getKey() instanceof String)
+        ? quoteString((String) entry.getKey())
+        : entry.getKey().toString();
+    sb.append(keyStr)
+      .append(':')
+      .append(valueToString(entry.getValue()))
+      .append(",");
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 507e3d9 and 8e5bd34.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/main/java/com/falkordb/impl/Utils.java (1 hunks)
  • src/test/java/com/falkordb/GraphAPITest.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/test/java/com/falkordb/GraphAPITest.java (1)

698-719: Well-structured test for validating map support.
The new test confirms that a node is created correctly with map properties and retrieved as expected. Consider adding an additional test for nested maps or edge cases (e.g., empty maps, null values in the map) to further increase coverage.

@gkorland gkorland requested a review from barakb December 25, 2024 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for Map in prepareQuery
2 participants