We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The code in line 162 in phase2/eval.py :
true_top5_predictions_count+= top5_accuracy true_top3_predictions_count+= top3_accuracy one_bin_off_val+= obol_val print(batch_format_str%(step, '[' + ', '.join('%.3f' % (item/(step+1.0)) for item in true_predictions_count) + ']', true_top5_predictions_count/(step + 1.0), true_top3_predictions_count/(step+1.0), obol_val/(step+1.0), accv_all/total_examples, prcv_all/total_examples, recv_all/total_examples))
true_top5_predictions_count+= top5_accuracy true_top3_predictions_count+= top3_accuracy one_bin_off_val+= obol_val
print(batch_format_str%(step, '[' + ', '.join('%.3f' % (item/(step+1.0)) for item in true_predictions_count) + ']', true_top5_predictions_count/(step + 1.0), true_top3_predictions_count/(step+1.0), obol_val/(step+1.0), accv_all/total_examples, prcv_all/total_examples, recv_all/total_examples))
I think the bold code obol_val is not right, but should be one_bin_off_val. Am I right?
obol_val
one_bin_off_val
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The code in line 162 in phase2/eval.py :
I think the bold code
obol_val
is not right, but should beone_bin_off_val
. Am I right?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: