[1603:??] Geographia (create base numerospace)

[fititnt]

• https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographia
  • https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locus
    • https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartographia
      • [English only] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographic_information_system
    • https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topographia
• https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_vocabulorum_geographicorum
• https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicipaedia:Glossarium_geographicum

---

We need to create at least one numerospace dedicated to the general topic what in Latin is called Geographia (which actually have several other subgroups, like Cartographia or (without Latin term) Geographic Information System. As soon as this is created and somewhat documented, we could close this topic.

What we have now

Some dictionaries (which are actually not handcraved, but heavily automated, but we not formally publish them yet) from 1603:45 Normās interimperia, like the issue MVP of [1603.45.16] /"Ontologia"."United Nations"."P"/@eng-Latn #2 would fit this new category. Also, the entire is a bit arbitrary, since most concepts already are meant to be used for exchange at international level.

There's is also other dictionaries, like the [1603:45:19] Dictiōnāria dē locī generibus which are not as automated.

Only one numeric namespace?

Compared to other subjects, geographic information may be ones which we are likely to compile usable dictionaries faster and with production usage sooner. So it could in few years be over 1-99 dictionaries. But anyway:

• We do not have limitations on how many digits a dictionary could have (we it could be 1-999 maybe even 1-9999)
• Dictionaries can be subdivided. We already do this at spreadsheet level, but there is noting blocking us to actually the base group of dictionaries become instead of [1603:9:99]^example be spited later in 3 like [1603:9:99:19]^example, [1603:9:99:29]^example and [1603:9:99:39]^example