You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would expect grouping by class (label) to be in the same order that our labels are listed in the categories palette, but this isn't the case in my sample (on the refactor-filtering-ui branch).
Also, we call these alternately Label, Category, and Class. Should we harmonize this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would expect grouping by class (label) to be in the same order that our labels are listed in the categories palette, but this isn't the case in my sample (on the refactor-filtering-ui branch).
I personally think that keeping it in alphabetical order (as it is currently) feels the most natural, although I'm not opposed to matching the palette ordering if that is the overall desire. If we keep alphabetical we could also add the ascending/descending toggle button that we have for the sort menu.
Also, we call these alternately Label, Category, and Class. Should we harmonize this?
Absolutely. After our most recent meeting it seems the consensus is to at least remove all instances of category. I will make these changes in their own PR.
I would expect grouping by class (label) to be in the same order that our labels are listed in the categories palette, but this isn't the case in my sample (on the refactor-filtering-ui branch).
Also, we call these alternately Label, Category, and Class. Should we harmonize this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: