-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test Content for Period Transitions #6
Comments
@dsilhavy I generated some test content:
@haudiobe Sorry but I forgot about stream 4, 5 and 6 (manifest can be seen here). Do we mean to put a gap in the manifest? Or do we mean adding a 3rd period? |
Clarification: we intended to put a gap. |
@rbouqueau One finding I had when quickly checking this. The |
I've just fixed it and re-uploaded the content. |
Thanks for the clarification in our call. I've regenrated the 6th MPD. All is complete for a pass of validation. |
The period continuity should signal the id of the Adaptation Set in the previous Period in its value, not the Period id. |
I did a check in dash.js nightly: https://reference.dashif.org/dash.js/nightly/samples/dash-if-reference-player/index.html
For the second period the MPD parameters lead to:
I would expect segment number 2 in period 1 to end at 5.985. Due to the PTO the first segment in period 2 starts at 6. Still there is no gap visible between 5.985 and 6.
This results in a 0.5 second difference between the media duration defined in the MPD and the bmdt defined in the sements (167936 - 143936) / 48000 = 0.5. I assume this is correct because of what is defined in the requirements:
However, I am not sure what the expected behavior is here. The bmdt of segment 3 is 311296 / 48000 = 311296 / 48000. 311296 / 48000. We set appendWindowEnd to 6seconds for the first period. Lets discuss in the next call. |
@dsilhavy The issue is in the audio silence duration that is prepend. I'm still investigating the issue. |
@dsilhavy It took me time but I think I addressed your concerns:
The only thing that is not perfect is the 1024 initial edit list. Since players don't handle well multiple edit list I just removed it (resulting in a 1024/48000 second shift). You can check the alignment of the high beep with the blink at second 10. |
I did a quick check in dash.js, results are here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OLRzskFmO5yL_kJpF6cILrO_uy-USrTmvsWZHEgqgtw/edit#gid=339302312 Let's discuss in the next IOP call |
I fixed the MPD@duration inconsistencies. For the other comment I'd be happy we take the time together to review the values together. |
Content available, but some open questions. @dsilhavy and @rbouqueau prepare some slides for discussing this. |
@rbouqueau @haudiobe Please find a powerpoint for discussion here: |
I guess we are commenting https://github.com/Dash-Industry-Forum/Test-Content/blob/main/ad-insertion-testcase6-av3.mpd here. eptDelta, slide 3: "The value of the earliest presentation time of the first Media Segment in this Representation in seconds is computed as the sum of the value of this attribute and the value of the @presentationTimeOffset in units of the @timescale attribute." => ept = eptDelta + pto: 4s = 4*48000 = 192000(ept) = eptDelta + 144384 => eptDelta = 47616. What do you think? I agree both the sentences we quote seem to phrase the equation in a different order. |
I think in both cases we end up with a negative value for
|
@haudiobe Opinion? |
Updated slides based on discussion in the Coformance Call: |
@dsilhavy I've updated the MPDs on the repo. May I ask for a quick check? |
@rbouqueau Thanks, please find my comments below Edit: One question: Where is the current version of the content hosted? The Github URLs do not contain a BaseURL so I can not check them in dash.js AV1P1
AV2
P1
P2
AV3P1
P2
AV4P1
P2
AV5P1
P2
AV6P1
|
Test Call 2021/11/12:
|
@dsilhavy Any better after my last commit? Let me know if there is any way for me to test also. |
@rbouqueau Thanks for the update. AV1, AV2, AV3, AV6 look good in my opinion. For AV4 and AV5 I suggest to start at segment boundaries. From the definition of testcase 4 above: "add all PTO and eptDelta and pdDelta signaling (eptDelta and pdDelta should be 0)" |
Can they really be zero if the timescale for the period start and duration are milliseconds? Or should we accept to have a micro-overlap? Opinion? |
Yes I think we need to agree on this. We either accept a small async (then all values would be 0) or we shift of major parts of the segment. For AV4 one thing that might need to be corrected: <SegmentTemplate media="audio_$Number$.m4s" initialization="audio_init.mp4" timescale="48000" presentationTimeOffset="576000" eptDelta="-143872" pdDelta="1024" startNumber="5">
<SegmentTimeline>
<S t="432128" d="143360"/>
<S t="576512" d="144384" r="1"/>
<S d="143360"/>
</SegmentTimeline>
</SegmentTemplate> It looks like the first segment is completely shifted out of the period with the current settings (eptDelta > S@d). Can you please check the duration here. This does not add up: 432128 + 143360 != 576512 Thanks |
I fixed the computation, thanks for reviewing. The error was that the computation was unfinished (cf the two |
One more thing I noticed in AV5:
|
Thanks for reporting. Fixed. |
Latest test results here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OLRzskFmO5yL_kJpF6cILrO_uy-USrTmvsWZHEgqgtw/edit#gid=1461143595 |
Looks good - we need to possibly update the audio to be continuous. |
A short description of the use case for the new test content.
This test content is to demonstrate audio playback across periods in case different operation modes are applied.
Background in slides here: https://mpeg.expert/live/nextcloud/index.php/s/PTEMNj8cpSzmC62
Test content requirements
General description and requirements
There should be a second content without audio edit lists to check the difference.
DASH-IF documents and links
urn:mpeg:dash:profile:cmaf:2019
profileRelation to CTA WAVE Test Vector database
Additional context
Any other information you want to add here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: