Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Peer Review 2 is happening now. For real, this time #20

Open
aammd opened this issue Feb 24, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Peer Review 2 is happening now. For real, this time #20

aammd opened this issue Feb 24, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@aammd
Copy link
Member

aammd commented Feb 24, 2016

Hi @BIOL548O/2016_students ,

My apologies! You all just got a ton of emails. 📧 ✖️ 💯

I tried to start Peer Review 2, but I did it incorrectly! It should be good now. Please let me know if you have some problem (e.g. you can't access your reviewee's repo, or you are reviewing the same person as last time)

😊 😳 ,
Andrew

@burkeprw
Copy link

Hey Andrew-

I did get the same reviewee as last time - Emil Stump (Data about
Seahorses).

I'm happy to review this, just let me know.

Cheers,
-Patrick

------ Original Message ------
From: "Andrew MacDonald" [email protected]
To: "BIOL548O/Discussion" [email protected]
Cc: "burkeprw" [email protected]
Sent: 2/23/2016 11:06:42 PM
Subject: [Discussion] Peer Review 2 is happening now. For real, this
time (#20)

Hi @BIOL548O/2016_students ,

My apologies! You all just got a ton of emails.

I tried to start Peer Review 2, but I did it incorrectly! It should be
good now. Please let me know if you have some problem (e.g. you can't
access your reviewee's repo, or you are reviewing the same person as
last time)

,
Andrew


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@aammd
Copy link
Member Author

aammd commented Feb 24, 2016

Alas! It seems i've made the same mistake twice! It seems that two people will be reviewing the same person this time around.

Let's just stick with the way things are right now!

@aammd
Copy link
Member Author

aammd commented Feb 26, 2016

@BIOL548O/2016_students ,

Let's get those reviews done by 5pm Today, everyone! That way, your reviewees will have the benefit of your feedback in time to prepare their final project for Tuesday.

@aammd
Copy link
Member Author

aammd commented Mar 2, 2016

Hello @BIOL548O/2016_students ,

Just a quick clarification about the Peer Reviews. I need two things from each of you:

  1. the marks you're giving your reviewee (submitted via Google Form)
  2. your comments following the Template

The review template for Peer Review 2 is on the website. Would you please check to confirm that you've submitted these comments (by copying and pasting it as a comment on the issue called "Peer Review 2 for (your reviewee)").

I've tried to be clearer about my plan this time around!
Thanks!
@aammd

@ljmcoleman
Copy link

Hi, Andrew! Can you please clarify what you mean about the marks submitted via Google Forms? I've been filling out the review templates in the individual issues, but I don't recall anything about marks.

@aammd
Copy link
Member Author

aammd commented Mar 2, 2016

There was a link to a google form in the issue that assigned you to review. here is the link to Peer review 2 again, just in case

@ljmcoleman
Copy link

Ah, yes! I remember this now. Thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants