request an fl.phasewrap~ object

[steadykammer]

I think making sub patchers like this is disappointing...

...and I request there just be a new fl.phasewrap~ object.

[AlexHarker]

I'd suggest a more efficient way (that doesn't require a new very specialised object) is:

[fl.expr~ wrap(in1, -pi, pi)]

This is probably near enough as efficient as building a specialist object as the constants are pre-calculated. So I don't see a case for bloating the object set here.