You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2020. It is now read-only.
With #162 being a major rewrite, I thought it could be a good opportunity to mix it up a notch. We're considering breaking changes like #136 as well, which further "helps"
CodeGeneration.Roslyn as a name has the following properties:
✔ direct reference to code generation area/feature
✔ direct reference to Roslyn which is a core component
❌ quite generic and not very recognizable/memorable
I propose to rename this project to a more unique and maybe catchy one. 😏🦄
My (currently only one) proposal:
Compilatron - I've stumbled upon it playing Factorio (it's an in-campaign tutor-bot) and immediately thought about this project.
it's not taken: GitHub, NuGet, Google (almost exclusively links to Factorio).
I'm very open for different proposals though. Please share yours!
PS. @AArnott I'd like to ask you for opinion in this matter. Do you think renaming this project is sensible? Discussable? And as an owner: given an interesting enough proposal, would you consider agreeing to that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With #162 being a major rewrite, I thought it could be a good opportunity to mix it up a notch. We're considering breaking changes like #136 as well, which further "helps"
CodeGeneration.Roslyn
as a name has the following properties:I propose to rename this project to a more unique and maybe catchy one. 😏🦄
My (currently only one) proposal:
Compilatron
- I've stumbled upon it playing Factorio (it's an in-campaign tutor-bot) and immediately thought about this project.I'm very open for different proposals though. Please share yours!
PS. @AArnott I'd like to ask you for opinion in this matter. Do you think renaming this project is sensible? Discussable? And as an owner: given an interesting enough proposal, would you consider agreeing to that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: